15th May 2012 - 4:21 pm
"The post-20-week D.C. abortion ban bill targets an entire group of individuals, women who live in the District of Columbia, and their constitutional rights. Using the women of one congressional district to reach for extreme encroachments on women’s reproductive rights has become a pattern of the House Republican majority, but also reflected nationwide. We will vigorously fight the bullying tactics of the Republican majority against the District’s women, and in standing up for ourselves, we recognize that we are also in the larger fight to protect the reproductive rights of women everywhere."
Eleanor Holmes Norton, in a statement regarding legislation introduced by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) in January.

Norton’s request to speak at this Thursday’s hearing on the bill was denied today. 
7th March 2012 - 10:32 am
suicideblonde:

Untitled (Your Body Is a Battleground) (1989) by Barbara Kruger
This piece that was done 23 years ago still rings very true in our current political times.

suicideblonde:

Untitled (Your Body Is a Battleground) (1989) by Barbara Kruger

This piece that was done 23 years ago still rings very true in our current political times.

11th February 2012 - 4:52 pm

GOP senators: Domestic violence against undocumented women and LGBTs is fine with us.

motherjones:

A very important NY Times editorial.

The bill includes smart improvements aimed, for example, at encouraging effective enforcement of protective orders and reducing the national backlog of untested rape kits. The Republican opposition seems driven largely by an antigay, anti-immigrant agenda. The main sticking points seemed to be language in the bill to ensure that victims are not denied services because they are gay or transgender and a provision that would modestly expand the availability of special visas for undocumented immigrants who are victims of domestic violence — a necessary step to encourage those victims to come forward.”

1st February 2012 - 10:00 am

Planned Parenthood, Komen & Moving Forward

amaditalks:

So Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure today announced that they will no longer give any funding to Planned Parenthood.

This funding allowed Planned Parenthood to provide breast examinations and referrals for mammography and ultrasound to patients at their health centers, patients who were able to be seen and treated at Planned Parenthood regardless of income or insurance, because of Planned Parenthood’s sliding scale fees and commitment to treating as many people as possible.

In the aftermath of this, which has turned into a flurry of opinion and counter-opinion, deleted comments on Komen’s Facebook wall, and a tweetstorm of epic proportion, some salient points worth consideration:

While pressuring Komen to reverse this decision is an option (and there is already an online petition going for that purpose) it seems unlikely to be effective. I am decidedly pessimistic about Komen walking back from this precipice.

Komen has said that this decision arose from a new policy of not funding any organization that is under government investigation. Since Planned Parenthood was already under investigation when the policy was changed, it’s pretty clear that the policy was targeting PP.

Moreover, this Komen policy and the subsequent de-funding came quickly behind the hiring of Karen Handel as Komen’s Senior Vice President for Public Policy. Those in Georgia recall that in 2010 Handel ran for governor of Georgia with a extremely anti-choice platform. This woman is responsible for policy decisions for Komen, and she is clearly opposed to Planned Parenthood.

And we cannot forget that the founder of Komen, Nancy Brinker, has long been tied to the highest ranks of Republican politics.

Komen didn’t cave to external pressure from the right wing, because the right wing is intrinsic to the executive power structure of Komen.

Those who rely upon Planned Parenthood as their health provider, who still need breast examinations, who still need funded referrals when there is an issue, well, they’re collateral damage in a culture war that begin more than 30 years ago and has always had its sights set not just on Planned Parenthood but any organization that supported or affiliated with them.

So where do we go from here?

Well we give Komen the business. We email (news@komen.org), we tweet (@komenforthecure), we call (972-701-2168). We absolutely refuse to donate, not directly, not by buying pink ribbon festooned (and pinkwashed) products, not by sponsoring someone for a 5K or a 3 day walk. So long as Komen plays politics with human lives, they should not see another single penny of our money.

But more importantly, far more importantly, we do donate to Planned Parenthood, we go over and above the money that they will lose because of Komen, we get every penny we can to Planned Parenthood to ensure that no one will go without a needed cancer screening, no one’s life will be placed at risk because of where they get their medical care.

Planned Parenthood — and its clients, by extension — must be our primary concern and our primary focus. The political battle will always be there, it can be put on hold for a while. The patients whose care is hanging in the balance cannot wait.

We must keep our focus, we must redouble our commitment, we must step into the breech.

Join me in making a tax-deductible donation to Planned Parenthood right now.

31st January 2012 - 5:15 pm

Amid abortion debate, Komen cancer charity halting grants to Planned Parenthood

The nation’s leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates — creating a bitter rift, linked to the abortion debate, between two iconic organizations that have assisted millions of women.

The change will mean a cutoff of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants, mainly for breast exams.

Planned Parenthood says the move results from Komen bowing to pressure from anti-abortion activists. Komen says the key reason is that Planned Parenthood is under investigation in Congress — a probe launched by a conservative Republican who was urged to act by anti-abortion groups.

…Planned Parenthood said the Komen grants totaled roughly $680,000 last year and $580,000 the year before, going to at least 19 of its affiliates for breast-cancer screening and other breast-health services.

A counterproductive and short-sighted move on the part of Komen. A politically-motivated investigation that will likely turn up zero evidence of the misuse of funds by Planned Parenthood should not result in the denial of breast-cancer screening services to women who otherwise do not have access to such services.

30th January 2012 - 8:26 pm
coketalk:

Senator Janet Howell, Baddass Bitch of the Day
To protest a bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound  before having an abortion, Virginia State Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax)  on Monday attached an amendment that would require men to have a rectal  exam and a cardiac stress test before obtaining a prescription for  erectile dysfunction medication.
“We need some gender equity here,” she told HuffPost. “The Virginia  senate is about to pass a bill that will require a woman to have totally  unnecessary medical procedure at their cost and inconvenience. If we’re  going to do that to women, why not do that to men?”

This is absolutely fantastic. Badass Bitch of the Day, indeed!

coketalk:

Senator Janet Howell, Baddass Bitch of the Day

To protest a bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound before having an abortion, Virginia State Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax) on Monday attached an amendment that would require men to have a rectal exam and a cardiac stress test before obtaining a prescription for erectile dysfunction medication.

“We need some gender equity here,” she told HuffPost. “The Virginia senate is about to pass a bill that will require a woman to have totally unnecessary medical procedure at their cost and inconvenience. If we’re going to do that to women, why not do that to men?”

This is absolutely fantastic. Badass Bitch of the Day, indeed!

(Source: coketalk)